Short communication: Does previous superovulation affect fertility in dairy heifers?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential negative effects of superovulation on subsequent fertility of dairy heifers. Holstein heifers (n = 1,783), 312 to 387 d of age, and 273 to 307 kg of body weight (BW) from 2 commercial farms were enrolled. These animals were first selected to be donors (446) or nondonors (CON, n = 1,327) according to their genomic values. Nondonor heifers (CON) were artificially inseminated (AI) according to standard procedures of each farm after reaching 320 kg of BW. Donor heifers were superovulated using a fixed FSH dose (180 mg NIH-FSH-P1; Folltropin-V, Vetoquinol Brasil, Mairiporã, SP, Brazil) and embryos were collected following standard procedures. Heifers that produced fewer than 8 viable embryos after first superovulation (SOV1, n = 337) were no longer used as donors, whereas the remaining heifers (SOV2, n = 109) were superovulated a second time within an interval of 48 to 54 d. Donor heifers (SOV1 and SOV2) were AI once they reached 320 kg of BW, at least 15 d after the last embryo collection. Data on age at first AI, at conception, and at parturition, as well as the number of services per conception, were analyzed by ANOVA, using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) procedure. Binomial variables (pregnancy per AI, overall pregnancy rate, open heifers at 500 d age, and late pregnancy loss) were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. The heifers selected to undergo superovulation twice (SOV2) yielded more total (12.6 ± 5.3 vs. 6.8 ± 4.6; respectively) and viable embryos (8.5 ± 3.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.8; respectively) than those superovulated only once (SOV1). Age at first AI, conception, and at parturition was greater in SOV2, but not in SOV1 compared with nondonor controls. In addition, pregnancy per first AI, overall pregnancy rate, services per conception, open heifers at 500 d of age, and occurrence of pregnancy losses after 60 d of gestation were similar among CON, SOV1, and SOV2 heifers. In summary, a single superovulation performed before heifers reach a minimum weight for breeding did not affect age at conception, calving or other indicators of reproductive efficiency. On the other hand, heifers superovulated twice were first inseminated at a later age than their birth cohorts, but had similar reproductive performance.

Perfil de progesterona em novilhas com diferente atividade luteal e tratadas com implantes vaginais / Serum progesterone in heifers with different luteal activity treated with vaginal devices

O dispositivo de liberação de progesterona (DLP) é muito importante em protocolos de Inseminação Artificial em Tempo Fixo (IATF). Representa cerca de 43% dos custos e é objeto de estudos sobre a eficiência da sua reutilização. No entanto, perfis de liberação de progesterona (P4) em animais com diferentes concentrações endógenas desse esteroide não são claramente descritos. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a concentração sérica de P4 em fêmeas com diferentes situações de atividade luteal, tratadas com DLP novo (1g de P4) por 8 dias. Trinta novilhas mestiças cíclicas foram divididas em três grupos: em G1 e G2, o DLP foi inserido (D0) sete dias após a ovulação induzida. Adicionalmente, 0,15mg de D-cloprostenol foi administrado três dias depois para promover a luteólise em G2. Para G3, o corpo lúteo foi lisado antes da inserção do DLP para que a P4 exógena fosse a única fonte desse hormônio. O sangue foi coletado no D0, D3, D5 e D8, e a P4 avaliada por RIA. Médias de P4 foram comparadas entre os grupos em cada dia e dentro do grupo, entre os dias, utilizando o teste Tukey. Antes da inserção do implante (D0), os níveis de P4 foram, nos grupos, semelhantes em G1 e G2, e superiores a G3 (5,3±3,1a e 5,3±1,4avs 0,6±0.3bng/mL, respectivamente-P<0,05). No D3, ocorreu o mesmo perfil (5,7±2,6a e 5,4±2,0a e 3,6±0.8bng/mL, respectivamente para G1 e G2 vs G3, P<0,05). Trinta e seis horas (D5) após a PGF, a P4 no G2 caiu para níveis semelhantes aos do grupo G3 e ambos diferiram (P<0,05) de G1 (3,3±1,6b vs 2,4±0,9b e 2,1±0.7bng/mL). Essa diferença se manteve (P<0,05) em D8 (3,1±1,3a, 1,8±0,8b e 1,6±0.6b ng/mL). O aumento da P4 após a inserção (D3 - D0) foi maior (P<0,05) em G3 que em G1 e G2 (2,8±0,9a vs 0,4±1,8b e 0,2±1.4bng/mL). Os animais com maior P4 endógena levam a menor liberação de P4 exógena a partir do DLP. Portanto, os níveis remanescentes de P4 no DLP após o uso dependem da concentração endógena de P4 do animal e possíveis alterações durante a permanência.(AU)

The progesterone (P4) device is a very important step in the ovulation control in Timed Artificial Insemination (TAI) protocols. It represents about 43% of the hormone costs, thus it has been the subject of several studies on efficiency of the reused device as an alternative to reduce TAI costs. However, to our knowledge, profiles for P4 release in animals with different endogenous concentrations of P4 are not clearly described. This study aimed to evaluate serum concentration of P4 in females with different ovarian conditions - related to luteal activity - and treated with a new intravaginal device (1g of P4) for 8 days. Thirty normally cyclic crossbred heifers were divided into three groups: for G1 and G2, P4 device was inserted (D0) seven days after ovulation (7 day old CL). Additional PGF (0.15 mg of D-cloprostenol) was given three days later to promote luteolysis in the G2 group. For G3, CL was killed before P4 insertion and the exogenous progesterone was the only source of this hormone. Blood samples were collected on D0, D3, D5 and D8 and P4 concentration was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Means for P4 concentration were compared among groups in each day and within the group among days using the Tukey test. Before P4 device insertion (D0), P4 levels were higher (P<0.05) in G1 and G2 when compared to G3 (5.3±3.1 and 5.3±1.4 vs. 0.6±0.3ng/mL, respectively). Three days later (D3), the same pattern was observed (5.7±2.6 and 5.4±2.0 and 3.6±0.8ng/mL, respectively for G1 and G2 vs. G3, P<0.05). Thirty-six hours (D5) after PGF injection (G2), P4 in G2 dropped to levels similar to the G3 group and both differed (P<0.05) from G1 (3.3±1.6 vs. 2.4±0.9 and 2.1±0.7ng/mL, G1 vs. G2 and G3, respectively). There were no differences (P>0.05) among groups on D8 (3.1±1.3, 1.8±0.8 and 1.6±0.6ng/mL, respectively, for G1, G2 and G3). Progesterone increase after P4 insertion (D3 - D0) was higher (P<0.05) in G3 compared to G1 and G2 (2.8±0.9 vs. 0.4±1.8 and 0.2±1.4ng/mL, respectively). The interpretation was that animals with higher endogenous P4 promote less release of the exogenous P4 from the device. Therefore, the remaining P4 levels from used progesterone devices depend on the physiological condition of the animal at the time of insertion and possible changes during the treatment.(AU)